In this new film, over 40 experts in the fields of structural engineering, high-rise architecture, controlled ... [See more]demolition, physics, chemistry and metallurgy lay out the case for a controlled demolition of the World Trade Center on 9/11. The experts cite evidence showing that high-temperature incendiaries and explosives were planted throughout the twin towers and the lesser-known Building 7 which collapsed later the same day.
The film also addresses the seeming implausibility of the implications of a controlled demolition. Eight experts in psychology (including four from Colorado) discuss the difficulties many people have in confronting this possible reality and how necessary the truth is for healing – both at the individual and collective levels.
Two years in the making, 9/11: EXPERTS SPEAK OUT is the latest film from Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth, represented by founder Richard Gage, AIA.
During the film's live television broadcast premiere on Saturday, August 18 at 7:00 pm on Channel 12.1, Richard Gage, member of the American Institute of Architects and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, will appear live in the CPT12 studio. Gage, who directed and produced the film, will comment on the film's finding and his group's rejection of the official World Trade Center reports.
“The official story about the attacks of September 11 falls apart when you look squarely at the facts and apply basic scientific principles to interpret them," says Gage. "After more than ten years, a high-level investigation of the evidence is long overdue. Too much is at stake here to sweep the concerns under the rug. Family members of 9/11 victims speak to the viewers of this film. They explain why they are still not happy with the answers they've been given by our government. And they are asking you to join them in looking at what our experts have to say."
Frances Shure will also be joining co-hosts Shari Bernson and Tom Colbert during the broadcast.
ABOUT RICHARD GAGE
Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects. He has been an architect for over 23 years and has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed, steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, a parking structure, and 320,000 square feet of mid-rise office space – altogether with about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing on the radio the startling conclusions of reluctant 9/11 researcher David Ray Griffin in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. Since founding Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Gage has presented Blueprint for Truth all over the world, and he has appeared on radio shows and television spots.
ABOUT FRANCES SHURE
Frances Shure is a retired business owner, Licensed Professional Counselor specializing in-depth psychology, and adjunct instructor at Naropa University. She has long worked for world peace and a sustainable environmental, is co-founder of Colorado 9/11 Visibility, one of the of the 9/11 Consensus Panel members, and is listed with Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth. She is the mother of four and the grandmother of eight grandchildren.
ABOUT ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan association of architects, engineers and affiliates dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to revealing truths about the “collapses” of the 3 World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001.
RELATED VIDEOS Solving the Mystery, the destruction of WTC Building #7
This 15-minute documentary, narrated by Ed Asner, highlights the third worst structural failure in modern history – the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20 pm on 9/11. The 47-story skyscraper "collapsed" nearly into its own footprint at free-fall acceleration in under 7 seconds.
A wide variety of technical experts – high-rise architects, structural engineers, controlled demolition technicians, chemists, physicists, and more – present explosive evidence that controlled demolition, not "normal office fires" as claimed by NIST, caused the total destruction of the building.
Produced by Richard Gage, AIA, founder of AE911Truth, "Solving The Mystery of WTC 7" sheds light on this little-known event, and makes apparent the need for a new WTC investigation.
SKYPE INTERVIEWS Dr. Robert Bowman
Bowman comments on the need of more non-mainstream media outlets.
Dr. Robert Bowman
Bowman asserts that we don't know who carried out the attacks, but we know there has been a massive coverup.
Dr. Robert Bowman & Senator Mike Gravel
Senator Mike Gravel and Dr. Bowman talk about the 9/11 attacks as a galvanizing excuse for America to go to war – but that the wars have actually been in support of our corporate interests. They also touch on the need for a new study of the attacks in order to end the myth on which these wars are based.
ABOUT DR. ROBERT M. BOWMAN, LT. COL., USAF, RET.
Robert M. Bowman holds a PhD from Caltech in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering and is a retired USAF Lieutenant Colonel, Vietnam veteran, and former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the US Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Republic Aviation Airpower Award, The Society of American Military Engineers' Gold Medal (twice), the Air Medal with five oak leaf clusters, and numerous other awards, he is one of the country's foremost authorities on national security. Following his retirement from the military, Bowman founded the Institute for Space and Security Studies and became active in the peace and justice movements.
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
I posted a previous comment on the documentary, and wish to add a summary note: Instead of calling for a independent investigation, simply generate a petition or other lobby device calling to prosecute the crimes of 9/11. If building 7 collapse is a suspect crime, then call for the criminal investigation of Larry Silverstein (sp), then lease holder for the properties in question. In this legal process, the prosecutor would be charged with creating the forensic investigation, hearings, grand jury, etc. If you simply do an independent investigation, there is no reason for this report to gain entrance to a congressional or judicial panel or court of law. It will sit in a drawer. But if you approach this legally, as in criminal prosecution, (events on 9/11 were crimes), then the entire investigative process is transparent.
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
I have seen your documentary coverage of the unanswered questions regarding the crimes of Sept. 11, 2001. I want to thank you, as others have also done, for CPT's courage in airing this type of material. From the days following the events, to present day, the unofficially answered questions have continued to be filed in the "conspiracy" box by the holders of the official UN-investigated events. Here is the problem: the failure of the previous administration to treat these events as a crime first, before calling it terrorism, avoided the legal process usually engaged in for any crimes on US soil- forensic investigations, grand jury, evidence hearings, and so on. The "conspiracy theories", generated from the obvious questions gained from scientific inquiries and knowledge, then provided the perfect cover for the absence of the required legal processes which would have officially produced the answers. The irony of the truth in evidence, in fact, confirmed the information generated from the questions, and confirmed in fact, there was a conspiracy. Again, all of this could have been avoided had the law simply been followed. The size of the crime does not justify skipping the forensic and legal due processes which are designed to reach the truth and prosecute the individuals responsible. Without the transparency gained in legal investigations where prosecutors join with all the experts required to produce the reconstructed event, the public was simply given a narrative and all the science and technology which filled in the gaps, got filed in the conspiracy box. It will take an act of congress and or the executive authority of the president to adjudicate the crimes of 9/11.