Home   |   12 Talk   |   Viewer Buzz   |   Contact Us     

Viewer Buzz

Discover what Colorado Public Television viewers have to say!
Read the emails from viewers posted in this online forum.
Why not join in? If you have ideas or observations that may be of interest to other viewers, please share your comments about Channel 12's programming!

Watch Online

Watch the taped broadcast – with special guest Richard Gage – on our video page.

Your support matters. Choose a gift below to pledge online, or call 1-800-690-5234.

9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out

6 comments in the last 6 months
9/11 program
Posted: February 11, 2015 by Name Withheld
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (6 comments)
A few years back you had a special on 9/11, along with a video pertaining to the program. Is this something that is still accessible to view/purchase? Thank you, Greg
Video missing
Posted: December 19, 2014 by Name Withheld
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (6 comments)
You had a very popular video called "Video: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" located at http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138 which seems to be no longer available. Is it located somewhere else? Perhaps it has been caused by a server problem. If it is available I would like to know.
Posted: October 20, 2014 by Michael Herzig
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (6 comments)
I applaud your presenting this video again. It is sad that you had to show it so late at a time when most viewers would not see it. But it still helps. I received a call from a friend who could not sleep Saturday night and was watching the show. He had not understood my views about the destruction of the 3 towers until your showing. Thanks.
CPT12 Response:
Thank you for your feedback and for watching Colorado Public Television.
CPT-12 Staff 
Kudos to CPT12
Posted: October 20, 2014 by Name Withheld
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (6 comments)
Many, many thanks to Colorado Public Television for the courage to air this controversial material that, in my opinion is must see, as painful as it may be. I am incredibly heartened that this is now being televised! I was a commercial jet aircraft mechanic on September 11, 2001 with extensive experience working on 757 aircraft amongst others. Within a couple of months of that awful day, I was convinced that the world was being lied to. It was the story we were being told about what had supposedly happened in the Pentagon attack that initially sparked my skepticism. I pored over high resolution photos of the impact site, photos posted on the Pentagon website, photos taken by Pentagon photographers, photos moments after the tragedy and later after the smoke cleared. In my years as an FAA Airframe and Power-plant mechanic, trade magazines were ubiquitous, I viewed countless articles of aircraft crash sights; one thing common to them all is identifiable aircraft wreckage, from seat cushions to landing gear, turbine engines, the tail section, etc. Yet there was no photographic evidence of 757 aircraft wreckage at the Pentagon. And in the earliest photos, the façade of the building is fully intact yet there is virtually no aircraft wreckage on the lawn; apparently we are to believe the entire aircraft went through a small hole or window or completely disintegrated. So was born my disbelief in the official story. But I have found that convincing others has been a near impossible task; most folks do not care to even talk about it at all. So I am extraordinarily heartened to see that your station is putting this before a much wider audience because the world should know the truth of these evil deeds. I don't know what happened on 911, but I do know that the official explanation is a lie, plain and simple. Thank you CPT12!
CPT12 Response:
Thanks for writing.  We appreciate your feedback.
CPT-12 Staff 
Reason for the questions - addition
Posted: September 12, 2014 by Name Withheld
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (6 comments)
I posted a previous comment on the documentary, and wish to add a summary note: Instead of calling for a independent investigation, simply generate a petition or other lobby device calling to prosecute the crimes of 9/11. If building 7 collapse is a suspect crime, then call for the criminal investigation of Larry Silverstein (sp), then lease holder for the properties in question. In this legal process, the prosecutor would be charged with creating the forensic investigation, hearings, grand jury, etc. If you simply do an independent investigation, there is no reason for this report to gain entrance to a congressional or judicial panel or court of law. It will sit in a drawer. But if you approach this legally, as in criminal prosecution, (events on 9/11 were crimes), then the entire investigative process is transparent.
CPT12 Response:
Thank you for your emails.
A thorough  criminal investigation of the events of 9/11 seems like a no brainer. I am surprised it was not done.
You may be interested in an  article I found on this subject.
Thanks for your feedback.
All the Best,
CPT12 Staff
The reason for the questions
Posted: September 12, 2014 by Name Withheld
Program: 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (6 comments)
I have seen your documentary coverage of the unanswered questions regarding the crimes of Sept. 11, 2001. I want to thank you, as others have also done, for CPT's courage in airing this type of material. From the days following the events, to present day, the unofficially answered questions have continued to be filed in the "conspiracy" box by the holders of the official UN-investigated events. Here is the problem: the failure of the previous administration to treat these events as a crime first, before calling it terrorism, avoided the legal process usually engaged in for any crimes on US soil- forensic investigations, grand jury, evidence hearings, and so on. The "conspiracy theories", generated from the obvious questions gained from scientific inquiries and knowledge, then provided the perfect cover for the absence of the required legal processes which would have officially produced the answers. The irony of the truth in evidence, in fact, confirmed the information generated from the questions, and confirmed in fact, there was a conspiracy. Again, all of this could have been avoided had the law simply been followed. The size of the crime does not justify skipping the forensic and legal due processes which are designed to reach the truth and prosecute the individuals responsible. Without the transparency gained in legal investigations where prosecutors join with all the experts required to produce the reconstructed event, the public was simply given a narrative and all the science and technology which filled in the gaps, got filed in the conspiracy box. It will take an act of congress and or the executive authority of the president to adjudicate the crimes of 9/11.
Most Talked-About Programs:
Last 30 days
Last 6 months

Copyright © 2015 Colorado Public Television         Contact Us| About Colorado Public Television| Privacy Policy| Purchase Policy| Site Index| pbs.org

Colorado Public Television - CPT12 (formerly KBDI Channel 12)   |    2900 Welton Street, 1st Floor   |    Denver, Colorado 80205   |    Contact Colorado Public Television

Web Design and Interactive Development by Frontera Interactive - Denver, Colorado